On 3/10/23 10:55, Claudio Fontana wrote:
On 9/15/23 21:00, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Currently accel_cpu_realize() only performs target-specific
realization. Introduce the [un]realize_cpu fields in the
base AccelClass to be able to perform target-agnostic
[un]realization of vCPUs.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Just thinking, for the benefit of the reader trying to understand the code later on,
maybe putting in a "target_" in there somewhere in the function name?
like "realize_cpu_target", vs "realize_cpu_generic" ?
Good idea, I like it, thanks!
