+Tom On Mon, Sep 25, 2023, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: > On 25.09.2023 20:30, Sean Christopherson wrote: > >> > >> Hyper-V enabled Windows Server 2022 KVM VM cannot be started on Zen1 Ryzen > >> since it crashes at boot with SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED + > >> STATUS_PRIVILEGED_INSTRUCTION (in other words, because of an unexpected #GP > >> in the guest kernel). > >> > >> This is because Windows tries to set bit 8 in MSR_AMD64_BU_CFG and can't > >> handle receiving a #GP when doing so. > > > > Any idea why? > > I guess it is trying to set some chicken bit? > > By the way, I tested Windows Server 2019 now - it has the same problem. > > So likely Windows 11 and newer version of Windows 10 have it, too. ... > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h > > > index 1d111350197f..c80a5cea80c4 100644 > > > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h > > > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h > > > @@ -553,6 +553,7 @@ > > > #define MSR_AMD64_CPUID_FN_1 0xc0011004 > > > #define MSR_AMD64_LS_CFG 0xc0011020 > > > #define MSR_AMD64_DC_CFG 0xc0011022 > > > +#define MSR_AMD64_BU_CFG 0xc0011023 > > > > What document actually defines this MSR? All of the PPRs I can find for Family 17h > > list it as: > > > > MSRC001_1023 [Table Walker Configuration] (Core::X86::Msr::TW_CFG) > > It's partially documented in various AMD BKDGs, however I couldn't find > any definition for this particular bit (8) - other than that it is reserved. I found it as MSR_AMD64_BU_CFG for Model 16h, but that's Jaguar/Puma, not Zen1. My guess is that Windows is trying to write this thing: MSRC001_1023 [Table Walker Configuration] (Core::X86::Msr::TW_CFG) Read-write. Reset: 0000_0000_0000_0000h. _lthree0_core[3,1]; MSRC001_1023 Bits Description 63:50 Reserved. 49 TwCfgCombineCr0Cd: combine CR0_CD for both threads of a core. Read-write. Reset: 0. Init: BIOS,1. 1=The host Cr0_Cd values from the two threads are OR'd together and used by both threads. 48:0 Reserved. Though that still doesn't explain bit 8... Perhaps a chicken-bit related to yet another speculation bug? Boris or Tom, any idea what Windows is doing? I doubt it changes our options in terms of "fixing" this in KVM, but having a somewhat accurate/helpful changelog would be nice.