> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2023 4:57 PM > @@ -300,6 +299,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_page_response); > /** > * iopf_queue_flush_dev - Ensure that all queued faults have been > processed > * @dev: the endpoint whose faults need to be flushed. > + * @pasid: the PASID of the endpoint. > * > * The IOMMU driver calls this before releasing a PASID, to ensure that all > * pending faults for this PASID have been handled, and won't hit the > address the comment should be updated too. > @@ -309,17 +309,53 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_page_response); > * > * Return: 0 on success and <0 on error. > */ > -int iopf_queue_flush_dev(struct device *dev) > +int iopf_queue_flush_dev(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid) iopf_queue_flush_dev_pasid()? > { > struct iommu_fault_param *iopf_param = > iopf_get_dev_fault_param(dev); > + const struct iommu_ops *ops = dev_iommu_ops(dev); > + struct iommu_page_response resp; > + struct iopf_fault *iopf, *next; > + int ret = 0; > > if (!iopf_param) > return -ENODEV; > > flush_workqueue(iopf_param->queue->wq); > + > + mutex_lock(&iopf_param->lock); > + list_for_each_entry_safe(iopf, next, &iopf_param->partial, list) { > + if (!(iopf->fault.prm.flags & > IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID) || > + iopf->fault.prm.pasid != pasid) > + break; > + > + list_del(&iopf->list); > + kfree(iopf); > + } > + > + list_for_each_entry_safe(iopf, next, &iopf_param->faults, list) { > + if (!(iopf->fault.prm.flags & > IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID) || > + iopf->fault.prm.pasid != pasid) > + continue; > + > + memset(&resp, 0, sizeof(struct iommu_page_response)); > + resp.pasid = iopf->fault.prm.pasid; > + resp.grpid = iopf->fault.prm.grpid; > + resp.code = IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID; > + > + if (iopf->fault.prm.flags & > IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_RESPONSE_NEEDS_PASID) > + resp.flags = IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_PASID_VALID; > + > + ret = ops->page_response(dev, iopf, &resp); > + if (ret) > + break; > + > + list_del(&iopf->list); > + kfree(iopf); > + } > + mutex_unlock(&iopf_param->lock); > iopf_put_dev_fault_param(iopf_param); > > - return 0; > + return ret; > } Is it more accurate to call this function as iopf_queue_drop_dev_pasid()? The added logic essentially implies that the caller doesn't care about responses and all the in-fly states are either flushed (request) or abandoned (response). A normal flush() helper usually means just the flush action. If there is a need to wait for responses after flush then we could add a flush_dev_pasid_wait_timeout() later when there is a demand...