On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 01:58:32PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > +static const struct pci_device_id virtiovf_pci_table[] = { > > + { PCI_DRIVER_OVERRIDE_DEVICE_VFIO(PCI_VENDOR_ID_REDHAT_QUMRANET, PCI_ANY_ID) }, > > libvirt will blindly use this driver for all devices matching this as > we've discussed how it should make use of modules.alias. I don't think > this driver should be squatting on devices where it doesn't add value > and it's not clear whether this is adding or subtracting value in all > cases for the one NIC that it modifies. How should libvirt choose when > and where to use this driver? What regressions are we going to see > with VMs that previously saw "modern" virtio-net devices and now see a > legacy compatible device? Thanks, Maybe this approach needs to use a subsystem ID match? Jason