On 19.09.2023 19:48, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > > > On 19.09.2023 16:35, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 03:19:54PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote: >>> On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 09:54 +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 07:56:00PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: >>>>> Hi Stefano, >>>>> >>>>> thanks for review! So when this patchset will be merged to net-next, >>>>> I'll start sending next part of MSG_ZEROCOPY patchset, e.g. AF_VSOCK + >>>>> Documentation/ patches. >>>> >>>> Ack, if it is not a very big series, maybe better to include also the >>>> tests so we can run them before merge the feature. >>> >>> I understand that at least 2 follow-up series are waiting for this, one >>> of them targeting net-next and the bigger one targeting the virtio >>> tree. Am I correct? >> >> IIUC the next series will touch only the vsock core >> (net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c), tests, and documentation. >> >> The virtio part should be fully covered by this series. >> >> @Arseniy feel free to correct me! > > Yes, only this patchset touches virtio code. Next patchset will be AF_VSOCK, > Documentation/ and tests. I think there is no need to merge it to the virtio > tree - we can continue in the same way as before during AF_VSOCK development, > e.g. merging it to net-next only. ^^^ I mean of course if there is need to merge to virtio tree also - no problem, just informing that the next set of patches doesn't touch virtio code. (except two several lines patches for drivers/vhost/vsock.c and net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c) > > Thanks, Arseniy > >> >>> >>> DaveM suggests this should go via the virtio tree, too. Any different >>> opinion? >> >> For this series should be fine, I'm not sure about the next series. >> Merging this with the virtio tree, then it forces us to do it for >> followup as well right? >> >> In theory followup is more on the core, so better with net-next, but >> it's also true that for now only virtio transports support it, so it >> might be okay to continue with virtio. >> >> @Michael WDYT? >> >> Thanks, >> Stefano >>
