On 9/10/23 04:28, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The target of xchg_tail is to write the tail to the lock value, so
adding prefetchw could help the next cmpxchg step, which may
decrease the cmpxchg retry loops of xchg_tail. Some processors may
utilize this feature to give a forward guarantee, e.g., RISC-V
XuanTie processors would block the snoop channel & irq for several
cycles when prefetch.w instruction (from Zicbop extension) retired,
which guarantees the next cmpxchg succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index d3f99060b60f..96b54e2ade86 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -223,7 +223,10 @@ static __always_inline void clear_pending_set_locked(struct qspinlock *lock)
*/
static __always_inline u32 xchg_tail(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 tail)
{
- u32 old, new, val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
+ u32 old, new, val;
+
+ prefetchw(&lock->val);
+ val = atomic_read(&lock->val);
for (;;) {
new = (val & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) | tail;
That looks a bit weird. You pre-fetch and then immediately read it. How
much performance gain you get by this change alone?
Maybe you can define an arch specific primitive that default back to
atomic_read() if not defined.
Cheers,
Longman
