On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 10:04 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 08:59:29PM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > index d8ecacd03ecf..c4028bf32e3f 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c
> > @@ -44,20 +44,6 @@ bool check_reject_set(int err)
> > return err == EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline bool vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext)
> > -{
> > - int ret;
> > - unsigned long value;
> > -
> > - ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(ext), &value);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - printf("Failed to get ext %d", ext);
> > - return false;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return !!value;
>
> get-reg-list will now assert on get-reg when an extension isn't present,
> rather than failing the __TEST_REQUIRE(), which would do a skip instead.
> We need both the return false version and the assert version.
>
Ok, Will keep this one for get-reg-list and add another one for
arch-timer specific usage.
> > -}
> > -
> > void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
> > {
> > struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s;
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
> Thanks,
> drew
