Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] iommu: Make iommu_queue_iopf() more generic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/25/23 4:17 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2023 10:30 AM

+	if (fault->prm.flags & IOMMU_FAULT_PAGE_REQUEST_PASID_VALID)
+		domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev_pasid(dev, fault-
prm.pasid, 0);
+	else
+		domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
+
+	if (!domain || !domain->iopf_handler) {
+		dev_warn_ratelimited(dev,
+			"iopf from pasid %d received without handler
installed\n",

"without domain attached or handler installed"

Okay.



+int iommu_sva_handle_iopf(struct iopf_group *group)
+{
+	struct iommu_fault_param *fault_param = group->dev->iommu-
fault_param;
+
+	INIT_WORK(&group->work, iopf_handler);
+	if (!queue_work(fault_param->queue->wq, &group->work))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
+	return 0;
+}

this function is generic so the name should not tie to 'sva'.

Currently only sva uses it. It's fine to make it generic later when any
new use comes. Does it work to you?

Best regards,
baolu



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux