On 8/25/2023 4:23 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Skip initializing the VMSA physical address in the VMCB if the VMSA is
NULL, which occurs during intrahost migration as KVM initializes the VMCB
before copying over state from the source to the destination (including
the VMSA and its physical address).
In normal builds, __pa() is just math, so the bug isn't fatal, but with
CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRTUAL=y, the validity of the virtual address is verified
and passing in NULL will make the kernel unhappy.
Fixes: 6defa24d3b12 ("KVM: SEV: Init target VMCBs in sev_migrate_from")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Peter Gonda <pgonda@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index acc700bcb299..5585a3556179 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -2975,9 +2975,12 @@ static void sev_es_init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
/*
* An SEV-ES guest requires a VMSA area that is a separate from the
* VMCB page. Do not include the encryption mask on the VMSA physical
- * address since hardware will access it using the guest key.
+ * address since hardware will access it using the guest key. Note,
+ * the VMSA will be NULL if this vCPU is the destination for intrahost
+ * migration, and will be copied later.
*/
- svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa = __pa(svm->sev_es.vmsa);
+ if (svm->sev_es.vmsa)
+ svm->vmcb->control.vmsa_pa = __pa(svm->sev_es.vmsa);
/* Can't intercept CR register access, HV can't modify CR registers */
svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_CR0_READ);
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@xxxxxxx>
