Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 03/10] x86: Use "safe" terminology instead of "checking"

[Like Xu <like.xu.linux@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 9/6/2022 7:52 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> @@ -138,13 +138,13 @@ static void test_no_xsave(void)
>       printf("Illegal instruction testing:\n");
>   
>       cr4 = read_cr4();
> -    report(write_cr4_checking(cr4 | X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) == GP_VECTOR,
> +    report(write_cr4_safe(cr4 | X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) == GP_VECTOR,
>              "Set OSXSAVE in CR4 - expect #GP");
>   
>       report(xgetbv_checking(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK, &xcr0) == UD_VECTOR,
>              "Execute xgetbv - expect #UD");

Oops, xgetbv_checking() has not been renamed to xgetbv_safe().

>   
> -    report(xsetbv_checking(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK, 0x3) == UD_VECTOR,
> +    report(xsetbv_safe(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK, 0x3) == UD_VECTOR,
>              "Execute xsetbv - expect #UD");
>   }