On 15.08.23 17:14, Steffen Eiden wrote:
From: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Destroy configuration fast may return with RC 0x104 if there are still bound APQNs in the configuration. The final cleanup will occur with the standard destroy configuration UVC as at this point in time all APQNs have been reset and thus unbound. Therefore, don't warn if RC 0x104 is reported. Signed-off-by: Viktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- arch/s390/kvm/pv.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c index 8d3f39a8a11e..8570ee324607 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c @@ -285,7 +285,8 @@ static int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm_fast(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc) WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle, 0); KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT DESTROY VM FAST: rc %x rrc %x", uvcb.header.rc, uvcb.header.rrc); - WARN_ONCE(cc, "protvirt destroy vm fast failed handle %llx rc %x rrc %x", + WARN_ONCE(cc && uvcb.header.rc != 0x104, + "protvirt destroy vm fast failed handle %llx rc %x rrc %x", kvm_s390_pv_get_handle(kvm), uvcb.header.rc, uvcb.header.rrc); /* Intended memory leak on "impossible" error */ if (!cc)