Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] iommu: Replace device fault handler with iommu_queue_iopf()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023/8/11 2:22, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 01:48:29PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
The individual iommu drivers report iommu faults by calling
iommu_report_device_fault(), where a pre-registered device fault handler
is called to route the fault to another fault handler installed on the
corresponding iommu domain.

The pre-registered device fault handler is static and won't be dynamic
as the fault handler is eventually per iommu domain. Replace calling
device fault handler with iommu_queue_iopf().

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu<baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 4352a149a935..00309f66153b 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -1381,7 +1381,7 @@ int iommu_report_device_fault(struct device *dev, struct iommu_fault_event *evt)
  		mutex_unlock(&fparam->lock);
  	}
- ret = fparam->handler(&evt->fault, fparam->data);
+	ret = iommu_queue_iopf(&evt->fault, dev);
  	if (ret && evt_pending) {
  		mutex_lock(&fparam->lock);
  		list_del(&evt_pending->list);
I don't get it, why not remove fparam->handler/data entirely in this
patch? There is no user once you do this change?

It needs some cleanups elsewhere, so I put it in a separate patch.

Best regards,
baolu



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux