Re: hugetlbfs and KSM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I asked this question quite a while ago, it seems huge pages do not get scanned for merging.

David Martin

----- "Bernhard Schmidt" <berni@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> running Debian Squeeze with a 2.6.32-3-amd64 kernel and qemu-kvm
> 0.12.3
> I enabled hugetlbfs on a rather small box with about five similar VMs
> today (all Debian Squeeze amd64, but different services)
> 
> Pro:
> * system load on the host has gone way down (by about 50%)
> 
> Contra:
> * KSM seems to be largely ineffective (100MB saved -> 1.3MB saved)
> 
> Am I doing something wrong? Is this a bug? Is this generally
> impossible
> with large pages (which might explain the lower load on the host, if
> large pages are not scanned)? Or is it just way less likely to have
> identical pages at that size?
> 
> Bernhard
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux