> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 2:43 AM > > On Thu, Aug 03, 2023 at 08:16:47AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > Is there plan to introduce further error in the future? otherwise this should > > be void. > > > > btw the work queue is only for sva. If there is no other caller this can be > > just kept in iommu-sva.c. No need to create a helper. > > I think more than just SVA will need a work queue context to process > their faults. > then this series needs more work. Currently the abstraction doesn't include workqueue in the common fault reporting layer.
