On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Eran Rom <eranr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christoph Hellwig <hch <at> infradead.org> writes: > > >> Ok. cache=writeback performance is something I haven't bothered looking >> at at all. For cache=none any streaming write or random workload with >> large enough record sizes got basically the same performance as native >> using kernel aio, and same for write but slightly degraded for reads >> using the thread pool. See my attached JLS presentation for some >> numbers. >> > Looks like the presentation did not make it... I am interested in the JLS presentation too. Here is what I found, hope it's the one you meant, Christoph: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/images/stories/slides/jls09/jls09_hellwig.odp Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
