On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:13:36AM +0800, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
>> > @@ -7214,6 +7217,13 @@ static void kvm_probe_msr_to_save(u32 msr_index)
>> > if (!kvm_caps.supported_xss)
>> > return;
>> > break;
>> > + case MSR_IA32_U_CET:
>> > + case MSR_IA32_S_CET:
>> > + case MSR_KVM_GUEST_SSP:
>> > + case MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP ... MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB:
>> > + if (!kvm_is_cet_supported())
>> shall we consider the case where IBT is supported while SS isn't
>> (e.g., in L1 guest)?
>Yes, but userspace should be able to access SHSTK MSRs even only IBT is exposed to guest so
>far as KVM can support SHSTK MSRs.
Why should userspace be allowed to access SHSTK MSRs in this case? L1 may not
even enumerate SHSTK (qemu removes -shstk explicitly but keeps IBT), how KVM in
L1 can allow its userspace to do that?
>> > +static inline bool kvm_is_cet_supported(void)
>> > +{
>> > + return (kvm_caps.supported_xss & CET_XSTATE_MASK) == CET_XSTATE_MASK;
>> why not just check if SHSTK or IBT is supported explicitly, i.e.,
>>
>> return kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
>> kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_IBT);
>>
>> this is straightforward. And strictly speaking, the support of a feature and
>> the support of managing a feature's state via XSAVE(S) are two different things.x
>I think using exiting check implies two things:
>1. Platform/KVM can support CET features.
>2. CET user mode MSRs are backed by host thus are guaranteed to be valid.
>i.e., the purpose is to check guest CET dependencies instead of features' availability.
When KVM claims a feature is supported, it should ensure all its dependencies are
met. that's, KVM's support of a feature also imples all dependencies are met.
Function-wise, the two approaches have no difference. I just think checking
KVM's support of SHSTK/IBT is more clear because the function name is
kvm_is_cet_supported() rather than e.g., kvm_is_cet_state_managed_by_xsave().
>
>kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) || kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_IBT)
>
>only tells at least one of the CET features is supported by KVM.
>
>> then patch 16 has no need to do
>>
>> + /*
>> + * If SHSTK and IBT are not available in KVM, clear CET user bit in
>> + * kvm_caps.supported_xss so that kvm_is_cet__supported() returns
>> + * false when called.
>> + */
>> + if (!kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) &&
>> + !kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_IBT))
>> + kvm_caps.supported_xss &= ~CET_XSTATE_MASK;
>
