Am 03.08.23 um 00:24 schrieb Sean Christopherson:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:Ilya Leoshkevich (6): KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into interrupt handlers KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping into program interrupt handlers KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping kernel-emulated instructions KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping userspace-emulated instructions KVM: s390: interrupt: Fix single-stepping keyless mode exits KVM: s390: selftests: Add selftest for single-steppingFYI, the selftests change silently conflicts with a global s/ASSERT_EQ/TEST_ASSERT_EQ rename[1], but the conflicts are very straightforward to resolve (just prepend TEST_). If we want to proactively avoid mild pain in linux-next, one option would be to merge the full kvm-x86/selftests branch/tag once I've made that immutable[2] (will be done Friday if there are no fireworks). Though we can probably just get away with doing nothing other than letting Paolo know there's a silent conflict. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/169101245511.1754469.7852701829984104093.b4-ty@xxxxxxxxxx [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/169101267140.1755771.17089576255751273053.b4-ty@xxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for telling. Paolo, do you have a preference? Janosch, Claudio I think this series is good to go otherwise.
