On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 02:48:41PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Especially the "For PROT_NONE VMAs, the PTEs are not marked > _PAGE_PROTNONE" is wrong: doing an mprotect(PROT_NONE) will end up > marking all PTEs on x86 as _PAGE_PROTNONE, making pte_protnone() > indicate "yes". > > So let's improve the comment, so it's easier to grasp which semantics > pte_protnone() actually has. > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs
