Re: [PATCH 0/4] RISCV: Add kvm Sstc timer selftest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 5:57 PM Andrew Jones <ajones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 09:37:36AM +0800, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 11:14 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > > > The sstc_timer selftest is used to validate Sstc timer functionality
> > > > in a guest, which sets up periodic timer interrupts and check the
> > > > basic interrupt status upon its receipt.
> > > >
> > > > This KVM selftest was ported from aarch64 arch_timer and tested
> > > > with Linux v6.5-rc3 on a Qemu riscv64 virt machine.
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to extract the ARM bits from arch_timer and make the bulk of
> > > the test common to ARM and RISC-V?  At a glance, there is quite a bit of copy+paste.
> >
> > Sure, I will have a try to consolidate the common code for ARM and RISC-V in v2.
> >
>
> Yes, afaict, we should be able to make aarch64/arch_timer.c another "split
> test", like we did for aarch64/get-reg-list.c, but before we do that, I'd
> like to get an ack from the Arm maintainers on the get-reg-list split to
> be sure that approach is acceptable.
>

Yes, we can re-use the split method.

Since there is less configuration data that should be handled, I think
it may be
easier for the timer test  to consolidate the code, since most of the
operations
can be overloaded for different ARCH.

I'll have a try and send the v2 soon!

Thanks!

> Thanks,
> drew




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux