Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: CR0 vs. KVM_SET_SREGS and !URG

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: CR0 vs. KVM_SET_SREGS and !URG
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 11:04:36 -0400
Cc: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, syzbot+5feef0b9ee9c8e9e5689@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jim Mattson <jmattson@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230613203037.1968489-1-seanjc@google.com>
References:

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

References:
- [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: CR0 vs. KVM_SET_SREGS and !URG
  - From: Sean Christopherson

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/7] KVM: Grab KVM references for stats fds
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] selftests/rseq: Play nice with binaries statically linked against glibc 2.35+
Previous by thread: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: selftests: Expand x86's sregs test to cover illegal CR0 values
Next by thread: Fwd: [PATCH] KVM: x86: remove unneeded variable
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux