On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 03:22:40 +0100,
Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Rename kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb() and the associated macro
> __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLB to kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() and
> __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS respectively.
>
> Making the name plural matches kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() and makes it more
> clear that this function can affect more than one remote TLB.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
> arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 4 ++--
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 04cedf9f8811..9b0ad8f3bf32 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -896,7 +896,7 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>
> -#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLB
> -int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb(struct kvm *kvm);
> +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS
> +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
How about making this prototype global? I don't see a point in having
it per-architecture, specially as you are adding arm64 to that mix in
the following patch.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
