Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmu_notifiers: Call arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs() when invalidating TLBs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 11:17:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jul 2023 17:56:17 +1000 Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > The arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs() is an architecture specific mmu
> > notifier used to keep the TLB of secondary MMUs such as an IOMMU in
> > sync with the CPU page tables. Currently it is called from separate
> > code paths to the main CPU TLB invalidations. This can lead to a
> > secondary TLB not getting invalidated when required and makes it hard
> > to reason about when exactly the secondary TLB is invalidated.
> > 
> > To fix this move the notifier call to the architecture specific TLB
> > maintenance functions for architectures that have secondary MMUs
> > requiring explicit software invalidations.
> > 
> > This fixes a SMMU bug on ARM64. On ARM64 PTE permission upgrades
> > require a TLB invalidation. This invalidation is done by the
> > architecutre specific ptep_set_access_flags() which calls
> > flush_tlb_page() if required. However this doesn't call the notifier
> > resulting in infinite faults being generated by devices using the SMMU
> > if it has previously cached a read-only PTE in it's TLB.
> 
> This sounds like a pretty serious bug.  Can it happen in current
> released kernels?  If so, is a -stable backport needed?

There are currently no in-kernel drivers using the IOMMU SVA API, so
the impact for -stable is sort of muted. But it is serious if you are
unlucky to hit it.

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux