Re: [RFC] KVM MMU: thinking of shadow page cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/30/2010 04:59 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
When we cached shadow page tables, one guest page table may have
many shadow pages, take below case for example:

  (RO+U) --->  |------| __     |------|
  (W+U ) --->  |  GP1 |   |    |  GP2 |
  (W+P ) --->  |------|   |-->  |------|

There have 3 kinds of permission mapping to GP1, so we should
allocate 3 shadow pages for GP1 and 3 shadow pages for GP2.
And it has 3 class permissions(R/W, U/S, X/NX) in x86's architecture,
for the worst case, we should allocate 2^3 pages for every paging
mapping level.

This waste is caused by that we only set the permission bits in PTE,
not in the middle mapping level.

So, i think we can mapping guest page table's permission into cache
shadow page table, then it can be shared between many shadow page tables
if their map to the same gust physics address. For above case, we only need 2
pages.

Any comments?

We've considered this in the past, it makes sense. The big question is whether any guests actually map the same page table through PDEs with different permissions (mapping the same page table through multiple PDEs is very common, but always with the same permissions). Do you know of any such guest?

--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux