Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] KVM: Simplify error handling in __gfn_to_pfn_memslot()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 07, 2023, Anish Moorthy wrote:
> Done
> 
> (somebody please let me know if these short "ack"/"done" messages are
> frowned upon btw. Nobody's complained about it so far, but I'm not
> sure if people consider it spam)

I personally think that ack/done messages that don't add anything else to the
conversation are useless.   The bar for "anything else" can be very low, e.g. a
simple "gotcha" can be valuable if it wraps up a conversation, but "accepting"
every piece of feedback is a waste of everyone's time IMO as the expectation is
that all review feedback will be addressed, either by a follow-up conversation or
by modifying the patch in the next version, i.e. by *not* pushing back you are
implicitly accepting feedback.

And an "ack/done" isn't binding, i.e. doesn't magically morph into code and guarantee
that the next version of the patch will actually contain the requested changes.



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux