Re: [kvm-unit-tests v4 03/12] powerpc: Abstract H_CEDE calls into a sleep functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/06/2023 09.58, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
This consolidates several implementations, and it no longer leaves
MSR[EE] enabled after the decrementer interrupt is handled, but
rather disables it on return.

The handler no longer allows a continuous ticking, but rather dec
has to be re-armed and EE re-enabled (e.g., via H_CEDE hcall) each
time.

Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/powerpc/asm/handlers.h  |  2 +-
  lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h   |  1 +
  lib/powerpc/asm/processor.h |  7 ++++++
  lib/powerpc/handlers.c      | 10 ++++-----
  lib/powerpc/processor.c     | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  powerpc/sprs.c              |  6 +-----
  powerpc/tm.c                | 20 +----------------
  7 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/powerpc/asm/handlers.h b/lib/powerpc/asm/handlers.h
index 64ba727a..e4a0cd45 100644
--- a/lib/powerpc/asm/handlers.h
+++ b/lib/powerpc/asm/handlers.h
@@ -3,6 +3,6 @@
#include <asm/ptrace.h> -void dec_except_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data);
+void dec_handler_oneshot(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data);
#endif /* _ASMPOWERPC_HANDLERS_H_ */
diff --git a/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h b/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
index 1b85f6bb..6299ff53 100644
--- a/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
+++ b/lib/powerpc/asm/ppc_asm.h
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
  #endif /* __BYTE_ORDER__ */
/* Machine State Register definitions: */
+#define MSR_EE_BIT	15			/* External Interrupts Enable */
  #define MSR_SF_BIT	63			/* 64-bit mode */
#endif /* _ASMPOWERPC_PPC_ASM_H */
diff --git a/lib/powerpc/asm/processor.h b/lib/powerpc/asm/processor.h
index ac001e18..ebfeff2b 100644
--- a/lib/powerpc/asm/processor.h
+++ b/lib/powerpc/asm/processor.h
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ static inline uint64_t get_tb(void)
extern void delay(uint64_t cycles);
  extern void udelay(uint64_t us);
+extern void sleep_tb(uint64_t cycles);
+extern void usleep(uint64_t us);
static inline void mdelay(uint64_t ms)
  {
@@ -27,4 +29,9 @@ static inline void mdelay(uint64_t ms)
  		udelay(1000);
  }
+static inline void msleep(uint64_t ms)
+{
+	usleep(ms * 1000);
+}
+
  #endif /* _ASMPOWERPC_PROCESSOR_H_ */
diff --git a/lib/powerpc/handlers.c b/lib/powerpc/handlers.c
index c8721e0a..296f14ff 100644
--- a/lib/powerpc/handlers.c
+++ b/lib/powerpc/handlers.c
@@ -9,15 +9,13 @@
  #include <libcflat.h>
  #include <asm/handlers.h>
  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
+#include <asm/ppc_asm.h>
/*
   * Generic handler for decrementer exceptions (0x900)
- * Just reset the decrementer back to the value specified when registering the
- * handler
+ * Return with MSR[EE] disabled.
   */
-void dec_except_handler(struct pt_regs *regs __unused, void *data)
+void dec_handler_oneshot(struct pt_regs *regs, void *data)
  {
-	uint64_t dec = *((uint64_t *) data);
-
-	asm volatile ("mtdec %0" : : "r" (dec));
+	regs->msr &= ~(1UL << MSR_EE_BIT);
  }
diff --git a/lib/powerpc/processor.c b/lib/powerpc/processor.c
index 0550e4fc..aaf45b68 100644
--- a/lib/powerpc/processor.c
+++ b/lib/powerpc/processor.c
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
  #include <asm/ptrace.h>
  #include <asm/setup.h>
  #include <asm/barrier.h>
+#include <asm/hcall.h>
+#include <asm/handlers.h>
static struct {
  	void (*func)(struct pt_regs *, void *data);
@@ -58,3 +60,44 @@ void udelay(uint64_t us)
  {
  	delay((us * tb_hz) / 1000000);
  }
+
+void sleep_tb(uint64_t cycles)
+{
+	uint64_t start, end, now;
+
+	start = now = get_tb();
+	end = start + cycles;
+
+	while (end > now) {
+		uint64_t left = end - now;
+
+		/* TODO: Could support large decrementer */
+		if (left > 0x7fffffff)
+			left = 0x7fffffff;
+
+		/* DEC won't fire until H_CEDE is called because EE=0 */
+		asm volatile ("mtdec %0" : : "r" (left));
+		handle_exception(0x900, &dec_handler_oneshot, NULL);
+		/*
+		 * H_CEDE is called with MSR[EE] clear and enables it as part
+		 * of the hcall, returning with EE enabled. The dec interrupt
+		 * is then taken immediately and the handler disables EE.
+		 *
+		 * If H_CEDE returned for any other interrupt than dec
+		 * expiring, that is considered an unhandled interrupt and
+		 * the test case would be stopped.
+		 */
+		if (hcall(H_CEDE) != H_SUCCESS) {
+			printf("H_CEDE failed\n");
+			abort();
+		}
+		handle_exception(0x900, NULL, NULL);
+
+		now = get_tb();
+	}
+}
+
+void usleep(uint64_t us)
+{
+	sleep_tb((us * tb_hz) / 1000000);
+}
diff --git a/powerpc/sprs.c b/powerpc/sprs.c
index 5cc1cd16..ba4ddee4 100644
--- a/powerpc/sprs.c
+++ b/powerpc/sprs.c
@@ -254,7 +254,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
  		0x1234567890ABCDEFULL, 0xFEDCBA0987654321ULL,
  		-1ULL,
  	};
-	static uint64_t decr = 0x7FFFFFFF; /* Max value */
for (i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
  		if (!strcmp(argv[i], "-w")) {
@@ -288,10 +287,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
  	if (pause) {
  		migrate_once();
  	} else {
-		puts("Sleeping...\n");
-		handle_exception(0x900, &dec_except_handler, &decr);
-		asm volatile ("mtdec %0" : : "r" (0x3FFFFFFF));
-		hcall(H_CEDE);
+		msleep(2000);
  	}
get_sprs(after);
diff --git a/powerpc/tm.c b/powerpc/tm.c
index 65cacdf5..7fa91636 100644
--- a/powerpc/tm.c
+++ b/powerpc/tm.c
@@ -48,17 +48,6 @@ static int count_cpus_with_tm(void)
  	return available;
  }
-static int h_cede(void)
-{
-	register uint64_t r3 asm("r3") = H_CEDE;
-
-	asm volatile ("sc 1" : "+r"(r3) :
-			     : "r0", "r4", "r5", "r6", "r7", "r8", "r9",
-			       "r10", "r11", "r12", "xer", "ctr", "cc");
-
-	return r3;
-}
-
  /*
   * Enable transactional memory
   * Returns:	FALSE - Failure
@@ -95,14 +84,10 @@ static bool enable_tm(void)
  static void test_h_cede_tm(int argc, char **argv)
  {
  	int i;
-	static uint64_t decr = 0x3FFFFF; /* ~10ms */
if (argc > 2)
  		report_abort("Unsupported argument: '%s'", argv[2]);
- handle_exception(0x900, &dec_except_handler, &decr);
-	asm volatile ("mtdec %0" : : "r" (decr));
-
  	if (!start_all_cpus(halt, 0))
  		report_abort("Failed to start secondary cpus");
@@ -120,10 +105,7 @@ static void test_h_cede_tm(int argc, char **argv)
  		      "bf 2,1b" : : : "cr0");
for (i = 0; i < 500; i++) {
-		uint64_t rval = h_cede();
-
-		if (rval != H_SUCCESS)
-			break;
+		msleep(10);
  		mdelay(5);

msleep() directly followed by an mdelay() looks weird now. Do we still need the mdelay()? Or could we maybe at least get a comment here why there are now two different delaying calls here?

 Thomas


  	}




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux