Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/6] arm: pmu: Fix chain counter enable/disable sequences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 10:03:59PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> In some ARM ARM ddi0487 revisions it is said that
> disabling/enabling a pair of counters that are paired
> by a CHAIN event should follow a given sequence:
> 
> Enable the high counter first, isb, enable low counter
> Disable the low counter first, isb, disable the high counter
> 
> This was the case in Fc. However this is not written anymore
> in subsequent revions such as Ia.
> 
> Anyway, just in case, and because it also makes the code a
> little bit simpler, introduce 2 helpers to enable/disable chain
> counters that execute those sequences and replace the existing
> PMCNTENCLR/ENSET calls (at least this cannot do any harm).
> 
> Also fix 2 write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0) in subtest 5 & 6
> and replace them by PMCNTENCLR writes since writing 0 in
> PMCNTENSET_EL0 has no effect. While at it, aslo removes a useless
> pmevtyper setting in test_chained_sw_incr() since the type of the
> counter is not reset by pmu_reset()

Looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@xxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Alex

> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - use enable_chain_counter() in test_chain_promotion() and
>   test_chained_sw_incr() as well. This also fix the missing
>   ISB reported by Alexandru.
> - Also removes a useless pmevtyper setting in
>   test_chained_sw_incr()
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - fix the enable_chain_counter()/disable_chain_counter()
>   sequence, ie. swap n + 1 / n as reported by Alexandru.
> - fix an other comment using the 'low' terminology
> ---
>  arm/pmu.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
> index 74dd4c10..0995a249 100644
> --- a/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -631,6 +631,22 @@ static void test_sw_incr(bool overflow_at_64bits)
>  		"overflow on counter #0 after 100 SW_INCR");
>  }
>  
> +static void enable_chain_counter(int even)
> +{
> +	write_sysreg_s(BIT(even + 1), PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the high counter first */
> +	isb();
> +	write_sysreg_s(BIT(even), PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the low counter */
> +	isb();
> +}
> +
> +static void disable_chain_counter(int even)
> +{
> +	write_sysreg_s(BIT(even), PMCNTENCLR_EL0); /* Disable the low counter first*/
> +	isb();
> +	write_sysreg_s(BIT(even + 1), PMCNTENCLR_EL0); /* Disable the high counter */
> +	isb();
> +}
> +
>  static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
>  {
>  	uint32_t events[] = {CPU_CYCLES, CHAIN};
> @@ -643,9 +659,8 @@ static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
>  
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, CPU_CYCLES | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> -	/* enable counters #0 and #1 */
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
> +	enable_chain_counter(0);
>  
>  	precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  
> @@ -655,10 +670,10 @@ static void test_chained_counters(bool unused)
>  	/* test 64b overflow */
>  
>  	pmu_reset();
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
>  
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, 0x1);
> +	enable_chain_counter(0);
>  	precise_instrs_loop(22, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  	report_info("overflow reg = 0x%lx", read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0));
>  	report(read_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1) == 2, "CHAIN counter #1 set to 2");
> @@ -687,8 +702,7 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
>  
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, SW_INCR | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> -	/* enable counters #0 and #1 */
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +	enable_chain_counter(0);
>  
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
>  	set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
> @@ -707,10 +721,9 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(bool unused)
>  	/* 64b SW_INCR and overflow on CHAIN counter*/
>  	pmu_reset();
>  
> -	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, events[1] | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW_32);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, ALL_SET_32);
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +	enable_chain_counter(0);
>  	set_pmcr(pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  	isb();
>  
> @@ -769,16 +782,17 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
>  	/* 1st COUNT with CHAIN enabled, next COUNT with CHAIN disabled */
>  	report_prefix_push("subtest3");
>  	pmu_reset();
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW2_32);
> -	isb();
> +	enable_chain_counter(0);
>  	PRINT_REGS("init");
>  
>  	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  	PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
>  
>  	/* disable the CHAIN event */
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x2, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
> +	disable_chain_counter(0);
> +	write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENSET_EL0); /* Enable the low counter */
> +	isb();
>  	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  	PRINT_REGS("After 2nd loop");
>  	report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) == 0x1,
> @@ -799,9 +813,11 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
>  	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  	PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
>  
> -	/* enable the CHAIN event */
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +	/* Disable the low counter first and enable the chain counter */
> +	write_sysreg_s(0x1, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
>  	isb();
> +	enable_chain_counter(0);
> +
>  	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  
>  	PRINT_REGS("After 2nd loop");
> @@ -825,10 +841,10 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
>  	PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
>  
>  	/* 0 becomes CHAINED */
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENCLR_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 1, 0x0);
> +	enable_chain_counter(0);
>  
>  	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  	PRINT_REGS("After 2nd loop");
> @@ -844,13 +860,13 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(bool unused)
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 0, MEM_ACCESS | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CHAIN | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevcntr, 0, PRE_OVERFLOW2_32);
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +	enable_chain_counter(0);
>  	PRINT_REGS("init");
>  
>  	mem_access_loop(addr, COUNT, pmu.pmcr_ro | PMU_PMCR_E);
>  	PRINT_REGS("After 1st loop");
>  
> -	write_sysreg_s(0x0, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
> +	disable_chain_counter(0);
>  	write_regn_el0(pmevtyper, 1, CPU_CYCLES | PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0);
>  	write_sysreg_s(0x3, PMCNTENSET_EL0);
>  
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux