Re: [RFC] vhost-blk implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/25/2010 05:48 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 08:29:03AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
We still have a virtio implementation in userspace for file-based images.

In any case, the file APIs are not asynchronous so we'll need a thread
pool.  That will probably minimize the difference in performance between
the userspace and kernel implementations.
The kernel has "real" aio when doing direct I/O, although currently we
can't easily use it from kernelspace.  Thejre's a few people who've been
looking into making it usable for that, though.

Interesting. Are there limitations on supported filesystems, or allocating vs. non-allocating writes?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux