> On Jun 28, 2023, at 10:30 AM, Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Jun 28, 2023, at 1:22 AM, Andrew Jones <andrew.jones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> OK, I see the .gitignore hunk in patch 1, which is good, since it >> certainly doesn't need its own patch. I'll just ignore this "patch”. > > Embarrassing… Will send v4. My double mistake. So I see this patch was not supposed to be sent, but other than that - you should have the series. Let me know if anything is wrong (as otherwise I won’t send v4).
