On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:09:26PM -0700, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023, isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > * VM type: Now we have KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM. How do we proceed? > > - Keep KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM for its use. Introduce KVM_X86_TDX_VM > > - Use KVM_X86_PROTECTED_VM for TDX. (If necessary, introduce another type in > > the future) > > How would KVM differentiate between software-protected VMs and TDX VMs if we go > with this option? Let's introduce new two VM type. I'm fine with two new VM types. I had KVM capability in mind if SEV implementation doesn't like new VM types. -- Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@xxxxxxxxx>
