RE: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 23

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 03/23/10 13:45, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> I don't think we can pull in:
>> 
>> - extboot
>> - ia64
>> - in-kernel pit[1]
>> - associated command line options
>> - device passthrough
>> 
>> The question is, if we dropped those things, would people actually
>> use qemu.git instead of qemu-kvm.git. If the answer is "no", what
>> set of things do we need in order for people to focus on qemu.git
>> instead of qemu-kvm.git.
> 
> I am not sure if anyone is still actively working on ia64. According
> to the qemu-kvm.git logs, there hasn't been any real ia64 changes to
> the code since my last commit in June of last year and then a couple
> of minor configure bits.
> 
> IMHO we can just let it rot - not sure if Xiantao is still interested?
For ia64 part, maybe we can keep the current qemu-kvm.git for the users. And it is not a must to push it into Qemu upstream. 
Xiantao

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux