On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 02:09:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 11:25:13PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote: > > Currently CONFIG_HAS_CC_PLATFORM is a prereq for building anything in > ^^^^^^ > > Use proper english words pls. > > > arch/x86/coco, but that is generally only applicable for guest support. > > > > For SEV-SNP, helpers related purely to host support will also live in > > arch/x86/coco. To allow for CoCo-related host support code in > > arch/x86/coco, move that check down into the Makefile and check for it > > specifically when needed. > > I have no clue what that means. Example? Basically, arch/x86/coco/Makefile is never processed if arch/x86/Kbuild indicates that CONFIG_HAS_CC_PLATFORM is not set. So if we want to have stuff in arch/x86/coco/Makefile that build for !CONFIG_HAS_CC_PLATFORM, like SNP host support, which does not rely on CONFIG_HAS_CC_PLATFORM being set, that check needs to be moved down into arch/x86/coco/Makefile. > > The last time we talked about paths, we ended up agreeing on: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yg5nh1RknPRwIrb8@xxxxxxx/ > > So your "helpers related purely to host support" should go to > > arch/x86/virt/svm/sev*.c > > And just to keep it simple, that should be > > arch/x86/virt/svm/sev.c > > and if there's real need to split that, we can do that later. Ok, makes sense. Thanks, Mike > > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette