On Mon, Jun 19 2023 at 08:00, Li, Xin3 wrote:
> To me it's better to keep the changes in one patch, thus the differences
> are more obvious.
The rename to vector_schedule_cleanup() can be obviously done first.
> We need a second patch to do vector cleanup in lapic_offline() in case the
> vector cleanup timer has not expired.
Right. I was lazy and just put a WARN_ON() there under the assumption
that you will figure it out.
But a second patch?
We don't switch things over into a broken state first and then fix it up
afterwards.
Thanks,
tglx
