On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:43:31PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/24/2010 05:37 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> Even better. So a guest which breaks out can't even access its own >> /sys/kvm/ directory. Perfect, it doesn't need that access anyway. > > But what security label does that directory have? How can we make sure > that whoever needs access to those files, gets them? > > Automatically created objects don't work well with that model. They're > simply missing information. If we go the /proc/<pid>/kvm way then the directory should probably inherit the label from /proc/<pid>/? Same could be applied to /sys/kvm/guest/ if we decide for it. The VM is still bound to a single process with a /proc/<pid> after all. Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
