> On Jun 8, 2023, at 2:38 PM, Dmytro Maluka <dmy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 3/14/23 17:29, Jason Chen CJ wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 09:58:27AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023, Jason Chen CJ wrote: >>>> This patch set is part-5 of this RFC patches. It introduces VMX >>>> emulation for pKVM on Intel platform. >>>> >>>> Host VM wants the capability to run its guest, it needs VMX support. >>> >>> No, the host VM only needs a way to request pKVM to run a VM. If we go down the >>> rabbit hole of pKVM on x86, I think we should take the red pill[*] and go all the >>> way down said rabbit hole by heavily paravirtualizing the KVM=>pKVM interface. >> >> hi, Sean, >> >> Like I mentioned in the reply for "[RFC PATCH part-1 0/5] pKVM on Intel >> Platform Introduction", we hope VMX emulation can be there at least for >> normal VM support. Just in case the PV approach is taken, please consider consulting with other hypervisor vendors (e.g., Microsoft, VMware) before you define a PV interface.
