On Mon, Jun 05, 2023, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 6/3/23 03:07, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > It's definitely stale, though unless Red Hat (presumed hoster) plans on decomissioning > > the site, I'd prefer to keep the reference and instead improve the site. We (Google) > > are planning on committing resources to update KVM documentation that doesn't belong > > in the kernel itself, and updatingwww.linux-kvm.org instead of creating something new > > seems like a no-brainer. I can't promise an updates will happen super quickly, but I > > will do what I can to make 'em happen sooner than later. > > We don't plan to decommission the website (especially not the old KVM Forum > content), though we might move it over to the same (container-based) setup > as wiki.qemu.org. > > What content do you have in mind that doesn't fit in the kernel > Documentation/ tree? Mostly developer focused stuff, e.g. using KVM to test/debug kernels and/or KVM itself, using 9PFS to hoist modules from into a VM without having to install the kernel in the guest image, in-depth walkthroughs of various code flows (e.g. how KVM takes an EPT violation and turns that into a mapping), etc.