On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 11:15:19PM -0700, Reiji Watanabe wrote:
> Introduce pmu_v3_is_supported() helper to check if the given
> PMUVer supports PMUv3, and use it instead of open coding it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 3 +--
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 2 +-
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> index 491ca7eb2a4c..5d2903f52a5f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> @@ -672,8 +672,7 @@ void kvm_host_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
> {
> struct arm_pmu_entry *entry;
>
> - if (pmu->pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_NI ||
> - pmu->pmuver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMUVer_IMP_DEF)
> + if (!pmu_v3_is_supported(pmu->pmuver))
> return;
Why not use pmuv3_implemented()?
--
Thanks,
Oliver
