Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Alistair Popple <apopple@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>>> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:44:40PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>>>>> > KVM already has locking for invalidate_start/end - it has to check
>>>>> > mmu_notifier_retry_cache() with the sequence numbers/etc around when
>>>>> > it does does hva_to_pfn()
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The bug is that the kvm_vcpu_reload_apic_access_page() path is
>>>>> > ignoring this locking so it ignores in-progress range
>>>>> > invalidations. It should spin until the invalidation clears like other
>>>>> > places in KVM.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The comment is kind of misleading because drivers shouldn't be abusing
>>>>> > the iommu centric invalidate_range() thing to fix missing locking in
>>>>> > start/end users. :\
>>>>> >
>>>>> > So if KVM could be fixed up we could make invalidate_range defined to
>>>>> > be an arch specific callback to synchronize the iommu TLB.
>>>>>
>>>>> And maybe rename invalidate_range() and/or invalidate_range_{start,end}() to make
>>>>> it super obvious that they are intended for two different purposes? E.g. instead
>>>>> of invalidate_range(), something like invalidate_secondary_tlbs().
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I think I would call it invalidate_arch_secondary_tlb() and
>>>> document it as being an arch specific set of invalidations that match
>>>> the architected TLB maintenance requrements. And maybe we can check it
>>>> more carefully to make it be called in less places. Like I'm not sure
>>>> it is right to call it from invalidate_range_end under this new
>>>> definition..
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to look at that, although it sounds like Sean already is.
>
> Thanks Sean for getting the KVM fix posted so quickly. I'm looking into
> doing the rename now.
>
> Do we want to do more than a simple rename and tidy up of callers
> though? What I'm thinking is introducing something like an IOMMU/TLB
> specific variant of notifiers (eg. struct tlb_notifier) which has the
> invalidate_secondary_tlbs() callback in say struct tlb_notifier_ops
> rather than leaving that in the mmu_notifier_ops.
>
> Implementation wise we'd reuse most of the mmu_notifier code, but it
> would help make the two different uses of notifiers clearer. Thoughts?
So something like the below incomplete patch (against v6.2) which would
introduce a new struct tlb_notifier and associated ops. The change isn't
huge, but does result in some churn and another layer of indirection in
mmu_notifier.c. Otherwise we can just rename the callback.
---
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
index a5a63b1c947e..c300cd435609 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
#include "../../io-pgtable-arm.h"
struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier {
- struct mmu_notifier mn;
+ struct tlb_notifier mn;
struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd;
bool cleared;
refcount_t refs;
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_free_shared_cd(struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd)
}
}
-static void arm_smmu_mm_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
+static void arm_smmu_mm_invalidate_range(struct tlb_notifier *mn,
struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_mm_invalidate_range(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain(smmu_domain, mm->pasid, start, size);
}
-static void arm_smmu_mm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
+static void arm_smmu_mm_release(struct tlb_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier *smmu_mn = mn_to_smmu(mn);
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = smmu_mn->domain;
@@ -231,15 +231,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_mm_release(struct mmu_notifier *mn, struct mm_struct *mm)
mutex_unlock(&sva_lock);
}
-static void arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_free(struct mmu_notifier *mn)
+static void arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_free(struct tlb_notifier *mn)
{
kfree(mn_to_smmu(mn));
}
-static const struct mmu_notifier_ops arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_ops = {
- .invalidate_range = arm_smmu_mm_invalidate_range,
- .release = arm_smmu_mm_release,
- .free_notifier = arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_free,
+static const struct tlb_notifier_ops arm_smmu_tlb_notifier_ops = {
+ .invalidate_secondary_tlbs = arm_smmu_mm_invalidate_range,
+ .release = arm_smmu_mm_release,
+ .free_notifier = arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_free,
};
/* Allocate or get existing MMU notifier for this {domain, mm} pair */
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_get(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier *smmu_mn;
list_for_each_entry(smmu_mn, &smmu_domain->mmu_notifiers, list) {
- if (smmu_mn->mn.mm == mm) {
+ if (smmu_mn->mn.mm_notifier_chain.mm == mm) {
refcount_inc(&smmu_mn->refs);
return smmu_mn;
}
@@ -271,9 +271,9 @@ arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_get(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
refcount_set(&smmu_mn->refs, 1);
smmu_mn->cd = cd;
smmu_mn->domain = smmu_domain;
- smmu_mn->mn.ops = &arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_ops;
+ smmu_mn->mn.ops = &arm_smmu_tlb_notifier_ops;
- ret = mmu_notifier_register(&smmu_mn->mn, mm);
+ ret = tlb_notifier_register(&smmu_mn->mn, mm);
if (ret) {
kfree(smmu_mn);
goto err_free_cd;
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_get(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
err_put_notifier:
/* Frees smmu_mn */
- mmu_notifier_put(&smmu_mn->mn);
+ tlb_notifier_put(&smmu_mn->mn);
err_free_cd:
arm_smmu_free_shared_cd(cd);
return ERR_PTR(ret);
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_get(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
static void arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_put(struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier *smmu_mn)
{
- struct mm_struct *mm = smmu_mn->mn.mm;
+ struct mm_struct *mm = smmu_mn->mn.mm_notifier_chain.mm;
struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc *cd = smmu_mn->cd;
struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = smmu_mn->domain;
@@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_put(struct arm_smmu_mmu_notifier *smmu_mn)
}
/* Frees smmu_mn */
- mmu_notifier_put(&smmu_mn->mn);
+ tlb_notifier_put(&smmu_mn->mn);
arm_smmu_free_shared_cd(cd);
}
diff --git a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
index d6c06e140277..157571497b28 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmu_notifier.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions;
struct mmu_notifier;
struct mmu_notifier_range;
struct mmu_interval_notifier;
+struct mm_notifier_chain;
/**
* enum mmu_notifier_event - reason for the mmu notifier callback
@@ -61,6 +62,18 @@ enum mmu_notifier_event {
#define MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_BLOCKABLE (1 << 0)
+struct tlb_notifier;
+struct tlb_notifier_ops {
+ void (*invalidate_secondary_tlbs)(struct tlb_notifier *subscription,
+ struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end);
+
+ void (*free_notifier)(struct tlb_notifier *subscription);
+ void (*release)(struct tlb_notifier *subscription,
+ struct mm_struct *mm);
+};
+
struct mmu_notifier_ops {
/*
* Called either by mmu_notifier_unregister or when the mm is
@@ -186,29 +199,6 @@ struct mmu_notifier_ops {
void (*invalidate_range_end)(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
const struct mmu_notifier_range *range);
- /*
- * invalidate_range() is either called between
- * invalidate_range_start() and invalidate_range_end() when the
- * VM has to free pages that where unmapped, but before the
- * pages are actually freed, or outside of _start()/_end() when
- * a (remote) TLB is necessary.
- *
- * If invalidate_range() is used to manage a non-CPU TLB with
- * shared page-tables, it not necessary to implement the
- * invalidate_range_start()/end() notifiers, as
- * invalidate_range() already catches the points in time when an
- * external TLB range needs to be flushed. For more in depth
- * discussion on this see Documentation/mm/mmu_notifier.rst
- *
- * Note that this function might be called with just a sub-range
- * of what was passed to invalidate_range_start()/end(), if
- * called between those functions.
- */
- void (*invalidate_range)(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
- struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end);
-
/*
* These callbacks are used with the get/put interface to manage the
* lifetime of the mmu_notifier memory. alloc_notifier() returns a new
@@ -234,14 +224,23 @@ struct mmu_notifier_ops {
* 2. One of the reverse map locks is held (i_mmap_rwsem or anon_vma->rwsem).
* 3. No other concurrent thread can access the list (release)
*/
-struct mmu_notifier {
+struct mm_notifier_chain {
struct hlist_node hlist;
- const struct mmu_notifier_ops *ops;
struct mm_struct *mm;
struct rcu_head rcu;
unsigned int users;
};
+struct mmu_notifier {
+ const struct mmu_notifier_ops *ops;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain mm_notifier_chain;
+};
+
+struct tlb_notifier {
+ const struct tlb_notifier_ops *ops;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain mm_notifier_chain;
+};
+
/**
* struct mmu_interval_notifier_ops
* @invalidate: Upon return the caller must stop using any SPTEs within this
@@ -283,6 +282,10 @@ static inline int mm_has_notifiers(struct mm_struct *mm)
return unlikely(mm->notifier_subscriptions);
}
+int tlb_notifier_register(struct tlb_notifier *subscription,
+ struct mm_struct *mm);
+void tlb_notifier_put(struct tlb_notifier *subscription);
+
struct mmu_notifier *mmu_notifier_get_locked(const struct mmu_notifier_ops *ops,
struct mm_struct *mm);
static inline struct mmu_notifier *
diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index f45ff1b7626a..cdc3a373a225 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -47,6 +47,16 @@ struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions {
struct hlist_head deferred_list;
};
+struct mmu_notifier *mmu_notifier_from_chain(struct mm_notifier_chain *chain)
+{
+ return container_of(chain, struct mmu_notifier, mm_notifier_chain);
+}
+
+struct tlb_notifier *tlb_notifier_from_chain(struct mm_notifier_chain *chain)
+{
+ return container_of(chain, struct tlb_notifier, mm_notifier_chain);
+}
+
/*
* This is a collision-retry read-side/write-side 'lock', a lot like a
* seqcount, however this allows multiple write-sides to hold it at
@@ -299,7 +309,7 @@ static void mn_itree_release(struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions,
static void mn_hlist_release(struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions,
struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
int id;
/*
@@ -307,8 +317,10 @@ static void mn_hlist_release(struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions,
* ->release returns.
*/
id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription, &subscriptions->list, hlist,
- srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu))
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, &subscriptions->list, hlist,
+ srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
/*
* If ->release runs before mmu_notifier_unregister it must be
* handled, as it's the only way for the driver to flush all
@@ -317,18 +329,19 @@ static void mn_hlist_release(struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions,
*/
if (subscription->ops->release)
subscription->ops->release(subscription, mm);
+ }
spin_lock(&subscriptions->lock);
while (unlikely(!hlist_empty(&subscriptions->list))) {
- subscription = hlist_entry(subscriptions->list.first,
- struct mmu_notifier, hlist);
+ chain = hlist_entry(subscriptions->list.first,
+ struct mm_notifier_chain, hlist);
/*
* We arrived before mmu_notifier_unregister so
* mmu_notifier_unregister will do nothing other than to wait
* for ->release to finish and for mmu_notifier_unregister to
* return.
*/
- hlist_del_init_rcu(&subscription->hlist);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&chain->hlist);
}
spin_unlock(&subscriptions->lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
@@ -366,13 +379,15 @@ int __mmu_notifier_clear_flush_young(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
int young = 0, id;
id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain,
&mm->notifier_subscriptions->list, hlist,
srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
if (subscription->ops->clear_flush_young)
young |= subscription->ops->clear_flush_young(
subscription, mm, start, end);
@@ -386,13 +401,15 @@ int __mmu_notifier_clear_young(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
int young = 0, id;
id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain,
&mm->notifier_subscriptions->list, hlist,
srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
if (subscription->ops->clear_young)
young |= subscription->ops->clear_young(subscription,
mm, start, end);
@@ -405,13 +422,15 @@ int __mmu_notifier_clear_young(struct mm_struct *mm,
int __mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
int young = 0, id;
id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain,
&mm->notifier_subscriptions->list, hlist,
srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
if (subscription->ops->test_young) {
young = subscription->ops->test_young(subscription, mm,
address);
@@ -427,13 +446,15 @@ int __mmu_notifier_test_young(struct mm_struct *mm,
void __mmu_notifier_change_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
pte_t pte)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
int id;
id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain,
&mm->notifier_subscriptions->list, hlist,
srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
if (subscription->ops->change_pte)
subscription->ops->change_pte(subscription, mm, address,
pte);
@@ -476,13 +497,15 @@ static int mn_hlist_invalidate_range_start(
struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions,
struct mmu_notifier_range *range)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
int ret = 0;
int id;
id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription, &subscriptions->list, hlist,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, &subscriptions->list, hlist,
srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
const struct mmu_notifier_ops *ops = subscription->ops;
if (ops->invalidate_range_start) {
@@ -519,8 +542,10 @@ static int mn_hlist_invalidate_range_start(
* notifiers and one or more failed start, any that succeeded
* start are expecting their end to be called. Do so now.
*/
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription, &subscriptions->list,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, &subscriptions->list,
hlist, srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
if (!subscription->ops->invalidate_range_end)
continue;
@@ -553,35 +578,20 @@ static void
mn_hlist_invalidate_end(struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions,
struct mmu_notifier_range *range, bool only_end)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
int id;
id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription, &subscriptions->list, hlist,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, &subscriptions->list, hlist,
srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
- /*
- * Call invalidate_range here too to avoid the need for the
- * subsystem of having to register an invalidate_range_end
- * call-back when there is invalidate_range already. Usually a
- * subsystem registers either invalidate_range_start()/end() or
- * invalidate_range(), so this will be no additional overhead
- * (besides the pointer check).
- *
- * We skip call to invalidate_range() if we know it is safe ie
- * call site use mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_only_end() which
- * is safe to do when we know that a call to invalidate_range()
- * already happen under page table lock.
- */
- if (!only_end && subscription->ops->invalidate_range)
- subscription->ops->invalidate_range(subscription,
- range->mm,
- range->start,
- range->end);
- if (subscription->ops->invalidate_range_end) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
+ const struct mmu_notifier_ops *ops = subscription->ops;
+
+ if (ops->invalidate_range_end) {
if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
non_block_start();
- subscription->ops->invalidate_range_end(subscription,
- range);
+ ops->invalidate_range_end(subscription, range);
if (!mmu_notifier_range_blockable(range))
non_block_end();
}
@@ -607,27 +617,24 @@ void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
void __mmu_notifier_invalidate_range(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
int id;
id = srcu_read_lock(&srcu);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain,
&mm->notifier_subscriptions->list, hlist,
srcu_read_lock_held(&srcu)) {
- if (subscription->ops->invalidate_range)
- subscription->ops->invalidate_range(subscription, mm,
- start, end);
+ struct tlb_notifier *subscription =
+ tlb_notifier_from_chain(chain);
+ if (subscription->ops->invalidate_secondary_tlbs)
+ subscription->ops->invalidate_secondary_tlbs(subscription,
+ mm, start, end);
}
srcu_read_unlock(&srcu, id);
}
-/*
- * Same as mmu_notifier_register but here the caller must hold the mmap_lock in
- * write mode. A NULL mn signals the notifier is being registered for itree
- * mode.
- */
-int __mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
- struct mm_struct *mm)
+int __mm_notifier_chain_register(struct mm_notifier_chain *chain,
+ struct mm_struct *mm)
{
struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions = NULL;
int ret;
@@ -677,14 +684,14 @@ int __mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
if (subscriptions)
smp_store_release(&mm->notifier_subscriptions, subscriptions);
- if (subscription) {
+ if (chain) {
/* Pairs with the mmdrop in mmu_notifier_unregister_* */
mmgrab(mm);
- subscription->mm = mm;
- subscription->users = 1;
+ chain->mm = mm;
+ chain->users = 1;
spin_lock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
- hlist_add_head_rcu(&subscription->hlist,
+ hlist_add_head_rcu(&chain->hlist,
&mm->notifier_subscriptions->list);
spin_unlock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
} else
@@ -698,6 +705,18 @@ int __mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
kfree(subscriptions);
return ret;
}
+
+/*
+ * Same as mmu_notifier_register but here the caller must hold the mmap_lock in
+ * write mode. A NULL mn signals the notifier is being registered for itree
+ * mode.
+ */
+int __mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
+ struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ return __mm_notifier_chain_register(&subscription->mm_notifier_chain,
+ mm);
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mmu_notifier_register);
/**
@@ -731,20 +750,34 @@ int mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmu_notifier_register);
+int tlb_notifier_register(struct tlb_notifier *subscription,
+ struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ mmap_write_lock(mm);
+ ret = __mm_notifier_chain_register(&subscription->mm_notifier_chain, mm);
+ mmap_write_unlock(mm);
+ return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tlb_notifier_register);
+
static struct mmu_notifier *
find_get_mmu_notifier(struct mm_struct *mm, const struct mmu_notifier_ops *ops)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain;
spin_lock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(subscription,
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain,
&mm->notifier_subscriptions->list, hlist,
lockdep_is_held(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock)) {
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
+ mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
if (subscription->ops != ops)
continue;
- if (likely(subscription->users != UINT_MAX))
- subscription->users++;
+ if (likely(chain->users != UINT_MAX))
+ chain->users++;
else
subscription = ERR_PTR(-EOVERFLOW);
spin_unlock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
@@ -822,7 +855,7 @@ void mmu_notifier_unregister(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
{
BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_count) <= 0);
- if (!hlist_unhashed(&subscription->hlist)) {
+ if (!hlist_unhashed(&subscription->mm_notifier_chain.hlist)) {
/*
* SRCU here will force exit_mmap to wait for ->release to
* finish before freeing the pages.
@@ -843,7 +876,7 @@ void mmu_notifier_unregister(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
* Can not use list_del_rcu() since __mmu_notifier_release
* can delete it before we hold the lock.
*/
- hlist_del_init_rcu(&subscription->hlist);
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&subscription->mm_notifier_chain.hlist);
spin_unlock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
}
@@ -861,15 +894,34 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmu_notifier_unregister);
static void mmu_notifier_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
{
- struct mmu_notifier *subscription =
- container_of(rcu, struct mmu_notifier, rcu);
- struct mm_struct *mm = subscription->mm;
+ struct mm_notifier_chain *chain =
+ container_of(rcu, struct mm_notifier_chain, rcu);
+ struct mm_struct *mm = chain->mm;
+ struct mmu_notifier *subscription = mmu_notifier_from_chain(chain);
subscription->ops->free_notifier(subscription);
/* Pairs with the get in __mmu_notifier_register() */
mmdrop(mm);
}
+void mm_notifier_chain_put(struct mm_notifier_chain *chain)
+{
+ struct mm_struct *mm = chain->mm;
+
+ spin_lock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
+ if (WARN_ON(!chain->users) ||
+ --chain->users)
+ goto out_unlock;
+ hlist_del_init_rcu(&chain->hlist);
+ spin_unlock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
+
+ call_srcu(&srcu, &chain->rcu, mmu_notifier_free_rcu);
+ return;
+
+out_unlock:
+ spin_unlock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
+}
+
/**
* mmu_notifier_put - Release the reference on the notifier
* @subscription: The notifier to act on
@@ -894,22 +946,16 @@ static void mmu_notifier_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
*/
void mmu_notifier_put(struct mmu_notifier *subscription)
{
- struct mm_struct *mm = subscription->mm;
-
- spin_lock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
- if (WARN_ON(!subscription->users) || --subscription->users)
- goto out_unlock;
- hlist_del_init_rcu(&subscription->hlist);
- spin_unlock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
-
- call_srcu(&srcu, &subscription->rcu, mmu_notifier_free_rcu);
- return;
-
-out_unlock:
- spin_unlock(&mm->notifier_subscriptions->lock);
+ mm_notifier_chain_put(&subscription->mm_notifier_chain);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmu_notifier_put);
+void tlb_notifier_put(struct tlb_notifier *subscription)
+{
+ mm_notifier_chain_put(&subscription->mm_notifier_chain);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tlb_notifier_put);
+
static int __mmu_interval_notifier_insert(
struct mmu_interval_notifier *interval_sub, struct mm_struct *mm,
struct mmu_notifier_subscriptions *subscriptions, unsigned long start,
