Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Update comments about MSR lists exposed to userspace

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/7/2023 8:46 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
Refresh comments about msrs_to_save, emulated_msrs, and msr_based_features
to remove stale references left behind by commit 2374b7310b66 (KVM:
x86/pmu: Use separate array for defining "PMU MSRs to save"), and to
better reflect the current reality, e.g. emulated_msrs is no longer just
for MSRs that are "kvm-specific".

Reported-by: Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 5ad55ef71433..c77f72cf6dc8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1427,15 +1427,14 @@ int kvm_emulate_rdpmc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_emulate_rdpmc);
/*
- * List of msr numbers which we expose to userspace through KVM_GET_MSRS
- * and KVM_SET_MSRS, and KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST.
- *
- * The three MSR lists(msrs_to_save, emulated_msrs, msr_based_features)
- * extract the supported MSRs from the related const lists.
- * msrs_to_save is selected from the msrs_to_save_all to reflect the
- * capabilities of the host cpu. This capabilities test skips MSRs that are
- * kvm-specific. Those are put in emulated_msrs_all; filtering of emulated_msrs
- * may depend on host virtualization features rather than host cpu features.
+ * The three MSR lists(msrs_to_save, emulated_msrs, msr_based_features) track
+ * the set of MSRs that KVM exposes to userspace through KVM_GET_MSRS,
+ * KVM_SET_MSRS, and KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST.  msrs_to_save holds MSRs that
+ * require host support, i.e. should be probed via RDMSR.  emulated_msrs holds
+ * MSRs that emulates without strictly requiring host support.
emulates -> emulate/emulated?

BTW, do you think is it better to use msrs_emulated instead of emulated_msrs to align the naming style?

+ * msr_based_features holds MSRs that enumerate features, i.e. are effectively
+ * CPUID leafs.  Note, msr_based_features isn't mutually exclusive with
+ * msrs_to_save and emulated_msrs.
   */
static const u32 msrs_to_save_base[] = {
@@ -1531,11 +1530,11 @@ static const u32 emulated_msrs_all[] = {
  	MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV,
/*
-	 * The following list leaves out MSRs whose values are determined
-	 * by arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c based on CPUID or other MSRs.
-	 * We always support the "true" VMX control MSRs, even if the host
-	 * processor does not, so I am putting these registers here rather
-	 * than in msrs_to_save_all.
+	 * KVM always supports the "true" VMX control MSRs, even if the host
+	 * does not.  The VMX MSRs as a whole are considered "emulated" as KVM
+	 * doesn't strictly require them to exist in the host (ignoring that
+	 * KVM would refuse to load in the first place if the core set of MSRs
+	 * aren't supported).
  	 */
  	MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC,
  	MSR_IA32_VMX_TRUE_PINBASED_CTLS,

base-commit: 31b4fc3bc64aadd660c5bfa5178c86a7ba61e0f7




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux