On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:42:06PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote: > Hello Bobby! > > Thanks for this patchset, really interesting! > > I applied it on head: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=d20dd0ea14072e8a90ff864b2c1603bd68920b4b > > And tried to run ./vsock_test (client in the guest, server in the host), I had the following crash: > > Control socket connected to 192.168.1.1:12345. > 0 - SOCK_STREAM connection reset... > [ 8.050215] BUG: kernel NULL pointer derefer > [ 8.050960] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode > [ 8.050960] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page > [ 8.050960] PGD 0 P4D 0 > [ 8.050960] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > [ 8.050960] CPU: 0 PID: 109 Comm: vsock_test Not tainted 6.4.0-rc3-gd707c220a700 > [ 8.050960] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14 > [ 8.050960] RIP: 0010:static_key_count+0x0/0x20 > [ 8.050960] Code: 04 4c 8b 46 08 49 29 c0 4c 01 c8 4c 89 47 08 89 0e 89 56 04 4f > [ 8.050960] RSP: 0018:ffffa9a1c021bdc0 EFLAGS: 00010202 > [ 8.050960] RAX: ffffffffac309880 RBX: ffffffffc02fc140 RCX: 0000000000000000 > [ 8.050960] RDX: ffff9a5eff944600 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000000 > [ 8.050960] RBP: ffff9a5ec2371900 R08: ffffa9a1c021bd30 R09: ffff9a5eff98e0c0 > [ 8.050960] R10: 0000000000001000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffa9a1c021be80 > [ 8.050960] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000002 R15: ffff9a5ec1cfca80 > [ 8.050960] FS: 00007fa9bf88c5c0(0000) GS:ffff9a5efe400000(0000) knlGS:00000000 > [ 8.050960] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > [ 8.050960] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 00000000023e0000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 > [ 8.050960] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > [ 8.050960] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > [ 8.050960] Call Trace: > [ 8.050960] <TASK> > [ 8.050960] once_deferred+0xd/0x30 > [ 8.050960] vsock_assign_transport+0xa2/0x1b0 [vsock] > [ 8.050960] vsock_connect+0xb4/0x3a0 [vsock] > [ 8.050960] ? var_wake_function+0x60/0x60 > [ 8.050960] __sys_connect+0x9e/0xd0 > [ 8.050960] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0xe/0x30 > [ 8.050960] ? do_setitimer+0x128/0x1f0 > [ 8.050960] ? alarm_setitimer+0x4c/0x90 > [ 8.050960] ? fpregs_assert_state_consistent+0x1d/0x50 > [ 8.050960] ? exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x36/0x130 > [ 8.050960] __x64_sys_connect+0x11/0x20 > [ 8.050960] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 > [ 8.050960] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0xb5 > [ 8.050960] RIP: 0033:0x7fa9bf7c4d13 > [ 8.050960] Code: 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 48 > [ 8.050960] RSP: 002b:00007ffdf2d96cc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000a > [ 8.050960] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000560c305d0020 RCX: 00007fa9bf7c4d13 > [ 8.050960] RDX: 0000000000000010 RSI: 00007ffdf2d96ce0 RDI: 0000000000000004 > [ 8.050960] RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000560c317dc018 R09: 0000000000000000 > [ 8.050960] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 > [ 8.050960] R13: 0000560c305ccc2d R14: 00007ffdf2d96ce0 R15: 00007ffdf2d96d70 > [ 8.050960] </TASK> > > > I guess crash is somewhere near: > > old_info->transport->release(vsk); in vsock_assign_transport(). May be my config is wrong... > > Thanks, Arseniy Thanks Arseniy! I now see I broke the tests, but did't break the stream/dgram socket utility I was using in development. I'll track this down and include a fix in the next rev. I should have warned this v3 is pretty under-tested. Being unsure if some of the design choices would be accepted at all, I didn't want to waste too much time until things were accepted at a high level. Best, Bobby
