Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/23/2010 11:31 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Chris Wright wrote: >> >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> >>> Yes, usability is a valid topic esp. if you promise to come w/ GUI >>> patches. >>> >>> >> - state and roadmap for upstream merge of in-kernel device models >> (looks to me like this central merge effort is stalled ATM) >> > > - alternative path of merging qemu-kvm.git's implementation as is and > cleaning it up in qemu.git. > > For kvm.git, I wouldn't dream of merging something with outstanding > issues and cleaning them up "later", but the situation is somewhat > different with qemu vs qemu-kvm. > So the benefit would be less merge conflicts/regressions on qemu-kvm.git? But you may break non-x86 KVM support in upstream as it already uses the cleaned up kvm subsystem. /me is not immediately convinced... We are more than half-way through this, so let's focus efforts for the last bits that make the difference widely negligible. This investment should pay off rather quickly. Jan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
