在 2023/5/30 09:52, Tianrui Zhao 写道: > Implement LoongArch vcpu KVM_ENABLE_CAP ioctl interface. > > Signed-off-by: Tianrui Zhao <zhaotianrui@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c > index 278fbafc59b4..5a88f815c412 100644 > --- a/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c > +++ b/arch/loongarch/kvm/vcpu.c > @@ -186,6 +186,23 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs) > return 0; > } > > +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + struct kvm_enable_cap *cap) > +{ > + int r = 0; > + > + if (!kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(vcpu->kvm, cap->cap)) > + return -EINVAL; It is a little strange to check extension of the whole vm in enable vcap capability. can we change to usage like general architectures? > + if (cap->flags) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (cap->args[0]) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (cap->cap) > + return -EINVAL; Do we need check args[0] and cap here ? Regards Bibo, Mao > + > + return r; > +} > + > long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, > unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg) > { > @@ -209,6 +226,15 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp, > r = _kvm_get_reg(vcpu, ®); > break; > } > + case KVM_ENABLE_CAP: { > + struct kvm_enable_cap cap; > + > + r = -EFAULT; > + if (copy_from_user(&cap, argp, sizeof(cap))) > + break; > + r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(vcpu, &cap); > + break; > + } > default: > r = -ENOIOCTLCMD; > break;