On Tue, 30 May 2023 14:52:43 +0200
Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If SCLP_CMDW_READ_SCP_INFO fails due to a short buffer, retry
> with a greater buffer.
the idea is good, but I wonder if the code can be simplified (see below)
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/s390x/sclp.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sclp.c b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
> index 34a31da..9d51ca4 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/sclp.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/sclp.c
> @@ -17,13 +17,14 @@
> #include "sclp.h"
> #include <alloc_phys.h>
> #include <alloc_page.h>
> +#include <asm/facility.h>
>
> extern unsigned long stacktop;
>
> static uint64_t storage_increment_size;
> static uint64_t max_ram_size;
> static uint64_t ram_size;
> -char _read_info[PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
> +char _read_info[2 * PAGE_SIZE] __attribute__((__aligned__(PAGE_SIZE)));
this is ok ^
[skip everything else]
> void sclp_read_info(void)
> {
> - sclp_read_scp_info((void *)_read_info, SCCB_SIZE);
sclp_read_scp_info((void *)_read_info,
test_facility(140) ? sizeof(_read_info) : SCCB_SIZE;
> + sclp_read_scp_info((void *)_read_info);
> read_info = (ReadInfo *)_read_info;
> }
>
