On Tue, 2023-05-23 at 11:25 +1200, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-05-12 at 16:50 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Set kvm_rebooting when virtualization is disabled in an emergency so that
> > KVM eats faults on virtualization instructions even if kvm_reboot() isn't
> > reached.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 ++
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > index 2cc195d95d32..d00da133b14f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > @@ -611,6 +611,8 @@ static inline void kvm_cpu_svm_disable(void)
> >
> > static void svm_emergency_disable(void)
> > {
> > + kvm_rebooting = true;
> > +
> > kvm_cpu_svm_disable();
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > index 008914396180..1dec932aff21 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -771,6 +771,8 @@ static void vmx_emergency_disable(void)
> > int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> > struct loaded_vmcs *v;
> >
> > + kvm_rebooting = true;
>
> Do we need a memory barrier here?
>
Hmm.. Please ignore this. I was confused between cache coherency vs memory
ordering. Not enough coffee.
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
