On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 09:26:33AM -0500, Steven Sistare wrote: > > This flag should probably be marked reserved. > > > > Should we consider this separately for v6.2? > > Ideally I would like all kernels to support either the old or new vaddr interface. > If iommufd + vfio compat does not make 6.2, then I prefer not to delete the old > interface separately. > > > For the remainder, the long term plan is to move to iommufd, so any new > > feature of type1 would need equivalent support in iommufd. Thanks, > > Sure. I will study iommufd and make a proposal. > > Will you review these patches as is to give feedback on the approach? > > If I show that iommufd and the vfio compat layer can support these interfaces, > are you open to accepting these in v6.2 if iommufd is still a ways off? I see > iommufd in qemu-next, but not the compat layer. What happened to this? I still haven't seen iommufd support for this? Jason
