> From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 4:16 AM
>
> > > + *
> > > * Return: 0 on success, -errno on failure:
> > > * -enospc = insufficient buffer, -enodev = unsupported for device.
> > > */
> > > struct vfio_pci_dependent_device {
> > > - __u32 group_id;
> > > + union {
> > > + __u32 group_id;
> > > + __u32 dev_id;
> > > +#define VFIO_PCI_DEVID_NONBLOCKING 0
> > > +#define VFIO_PCI_DEVID_BLOCKING -1
> >
> > The above description seems like it's leaning towards OWNED rather than
> > BLOCKING.
>
> Also these should be defined relative to something defined in IOMMUFD
> rather than inventing values here. We can't have the valid devid
> number space owned by IOMMUFD conflict with these definitions. Thanks,
Jason has proposed to reserve all negative IDs and 0 in iommufd. In that case,
can vfio define the numbers now?
Regards,
Yi Liu
