On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 20:46:26 +0100, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 12:40 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Paolo, > > > > Here's the initial set of changes for KVM/arm64. A bunch of > > infrastructure changes this time around, with two new user > > visible changes (hypercall forwarding to userspace, global counter > > offset) and a large set of locking inversion fixes. > > > > The remaining of the patches contain the NV timer emulation code, and > > a small set of less important fixes/improvements. > > > > Please pull, > > Queued, thanks! I assume I'll get -rc pull requests from you as well > over the next two months? That's the plan, yes. We aim to mimic what arm64 does by taking turn in maintaining the tree for a given kernel version (initial drop + fixes), unless something crops up. This means that while I'm dealing with fixes for 6.4, Oliver can queue 6.5 material in parallel. Which is why you have seen a late 6.3 PR for fixes and a 6.4 PR for new feature basically at the same time. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
