Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] lib: s390x: uv: Add pv guest requirement check function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/21/23 16:13, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 11:36:44 +0000
Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

When running PV guests some of the UV memory needs to be allocated
with > 31 bit addresses which means tests with PV guests will always
need a lot more memory than other tests.
Additionally facilities nr 158 and sclp.sief2 need to be available.

Let's add a function that checks for these requirements and prints a
helpful skip message.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  lib/s390x/snippet.h |  7 +++++++
  lib/s390x/uv.c      | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
  lib/s390x/uv.h      |  1 +
  s390x/pv-diags.c    |  8 +-------
  4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/s390x/snippet.h b/lib/s390x/snippet.h
index 57045994..11ec54c3 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/snippet.h
+++ b/lib/s390x/snippet.h
@@ -30,6 +30,13 @@
  #define SNIPPET_HDR_LEN(type, file) \
  	((uintptr_t)SNIPPET_HDR_END(type, file) - (uintptr_t)SNIPPET_HDR_START(type, file))
+/*
+ * Some of the UV memory needs to be allocated with >31 bit
+ * addresses which means we need a lot more memory than other
+ * tests.
+ */
+#define SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE	(SZ_1M * 2200UL)
+
  #define SNIPPET_PV_TWEAK0	0x42UL
  #define SNIPPET_PV_TWEAK1	0UL
  #define SNIPPET_UNPACK_OFF	0
diff --git a/lib/s390x/uv.c b/lib/s390x/uv.c
index 383271a5..db47536c 100644
--- a/lib/s390x/uv.c
+++ b/lib/s390x/uv.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
  #include <asm/uv.h>
  #include <uv.h>
  #include <sie.h>
+#include <snippet.h>
static struct uv_cb_qui uvcb_qui = {
  	.header.cmd = UVC_CMD_QUI,
@@ -38,6 +39,25 @@ bool uv_os_is_host(void)
  	return test_facility(158) && uv_query_test_call(BIT_UVC_CMD_INIT_UV);
  }
+bool uv_guest_requirement_checks(void)

I would call it uv_host_requirement_checks since it will run on the
host to check if the host meets certain requirements

Sure
If someone has a shorter suggestion I'd also be happy to hear it.


+{
+	if (!test_facility(158)) {
+		report_skip("UV Call facility unavailable");
+		return false;
+	}
+	if (!sclp_facilities.has_sief2) {
+		report_skip("SIEF2 facility unavailable");
+		return false;
+	}
+	if (get_ram_size() < SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE) {
+		report_skip("Not enough memory. This test needs about %ld MB of memory",
+			    SNIPPET_PV_MIN_MEM_SIZE / 1024 / 1024);

a better way to do this would be to check the amount of memory needed
by the Ultravisor and check if that size + 2GB is available

of course in that case unittest.cfg would also need to be adjusted

Could do, but in this case I opted for simplicity.




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux