On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 11:19:23AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 02:59:37PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 10:37:22AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> >
> > > How about the following piece? Needs a test with QEMU though..
> > >
> > > static const size_t iommufd_device_data_size[] = {
> > > [IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_NONE] = 0,
> > > [IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_INTEL_VTD] = 0,
> > > [IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3] =
> > > sizeof(struct iommu_device_data_arm_smmuv3),
> > > };
> >
> > If we need more than one of these things we'll need a better
> > solution..
>
> How about adding ops->device_data_size to store the value?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/cover.1682234302.git.nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx/
I sent a v3 that includes this replacing the data_size array.
If it looks good, we can drop the other two data_size arrays
for hwpt in the nesting series too.
Thanks
Nic
