Re: Getting the kvm-riscv tree in next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 22, 2023, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 4/21/23 21:10, Oliver Upton wrote:
> > I've also noticed that for the past few kernel release cycles you've
> > used an extremely late rc (i.e. -rc7 or -rc8), which I fear only
> > draws more scrutiny.
> 
> Heh, I just wrote the same thing to Anup.  In particular, having kvm-riscv
> in next (either directly or by sending early pull requests to me) would have
> helped me understand the conflicts between the core and KVM trees for
> RISC-V, because Stephen Rothwell would have alerted me about them.

Speaking of not-early pull requests, I'm not going to get the x86 pull requests
sent until Monday.  Everything has been in place for a few weeks now, but I buried
myself too deep in UPM/restrictedmem stuff and ran out of time today (and I don't
trust my brain to not make stupid mistakes at this point).



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux