On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 09:36:46AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > If we don't support singletion dev_set hot-reset, noiommu devices in cdev > > path shall fail the hot-reset if empty-fd array is provided. But we may just > > document that empty-fd array does not work for noiommu. User should > > use the device fd array. > > I don't see any replies to my comment on 08/12 where I again question > why we need an empty array option. I was pressing we'd do empty-fd only and not do the device fd array at all since it is such an ugly fit for the use cases we have. But it is such a minor detail if you don't want it then take it out. > This singleton dev-set notion seems equally unjustified. Do we just > need to deal with hot-reset being unsupported for no-iommu devices > with iommufd? It was to support no-iommu, if you want to de-support it then it can go away too. AFAIK dpdk doesn't use this feature and it is the only user we know of that has support for no-iommu so it is probably safe. Jason